Risk-Based Testing
Risk-based testing tool with a live risk register
Record what could go wrong, score each risk by likelihood x impact, and link it to the test cases, requirements, and defects that keep it in check. See which risks are backed by tests, and run the riskiest cases first.
Risk-Based Testing is an Enterprise plan capability.
Trusted by QA teams at
Key advantages
What teams get with Risk-Based Testing
Score risks, not guesses
Every risk gets a likelihood and an impact from your project's scales. TestCollab multiplies them into an exposure score and a colour-coded band, so you can rank the register from most to least dangerous.
Trace risk to test to result
Link each risk to the test cases, requirements, and defects that address it. The link shows on both sides, and the register can list the risks that have no tests behind them or whose tests are failing.
Prove coverage where it matters
Risk coverage is reported per exposure band, so a gap in your top band is visible at a glance instead of being averaged away in a spreadsheet.
Run the riskiest tests first
A Risk Level column on test cases and test plans carries each case's highest linked-risk exposure. Sort and filter by it so execution starts where a failure would hurt most.
Register & matrix
A risk register and risk matrix inside your test management tool
Record risks next to the test cases that cover them. No separate spreadsheet, and no copy-paste between tools.
One register per project
Each risk gets an RK- ID, a type, a status, an owner, and a mitigation plan. Search by ID, title, or description, choose which columns to show, and switch between all risks, uncovered risks, and risks with failing tests.
Exposure is calculated for you
Pick a likelihood and an impact when you record the risk. TestCollab multiplies the two scores into an exposure number and drops the risk into the matching band, so nobody does the arithmetic by hand.
Likelihood x impact heat map
The risk matrix tab plots every risk on a likelihood x impact grid coloured by your exposure bands. Click a cell to open the register filtered to the risks in it.
Traceability
Risk to test case traceability, in both directions
Link a risk once and the connection shows on the risk, the test case, the requirement, and the defect.
Link from the risk
Open a risk and link it to test cases, requirements, or defects. Search by title or by business ID. Each linked item opens in a new tab and can be unlinked in one click.
Risk Level on every test case
Test cases show a Risk Level pill with their highest linked-risk exposure, next to the risks they cover. The same column is on test plans, so you can sort and filter execution by risk.
Which tests protect which risk
The register's Test Cases column lists the cases linked to each risk, next to a count of how many are linked. You can answer "is our most critical risk actually tested?" without opening a single test case.
Coverage
Risk coverage and verification status you can show an auditor
The question is not "how many tests did we run?" It is "is every critical risk covered by a passing test?"
Coverage by exposure band
The Risk summary above the register shows total risks, how many sit in your most severe bands, and the share of risks backed by tests, broken down band by band. A band with no risks reads 0%, so an empty band never looks fully covered.
Verification status per risk
A Verification column shows whether the tests linked to each risk are passing, failing, or have never run. Switch the register to Uncovered or Failing tests to list the problems, then create a test plan for them without leaving the page.
Residual risk and mitigation
When a risk moves to a mitigation status, record the owner, the mitigation strategy, target and review dates, and the residual likelihood and impact. The register shows the residual exposure next to the original, so you can see how much danger is left.
Configuration
Configurable scoring that matches how your organisation rates risk
Ships with sensible defaults. Project admins can reshape every scale in a few minutes, and each project can have its own setup.
Exposure bands you define
Set the thresholds that turn a raw score into a band. TestCollab shows the range your scales produce, checks the bands cover all of it, and previews the resulting heat map before you save.
Statuses with open and closed states
Every status is either open or closed, and the closed ones count as resolved in residual-risk reporting. Add your own and give it a colour. TestCollab keeps at least one of each and blocks deleting a status that risks are using.
Risk types and scales
Rename or add the categories used to classify risks, and give the likelihood and impact scales your own labels and scores. The defaults are a five-point scale in each direction.
Governance
Built for regulated teams and audit trails
Risk data is only useful if the right people can change it and everyone can find it.
Role-based permissions
Everyone on the project can view the register. Adding, editing, deleting, and linking risks are controlled per role with five permissions, including "only risks created by them" variants. Risk settings are admin-only.
Every risk has its own URL
Paste a risk link into a ticket, a document, or a chat message and it opens directly. Readable business IDs such as RK-12, TC-204, and TP-31 replace raw row numbers across the product.
An evidence chain for audits
Risk to requirement to test case to result to defect, with defects synced to Jira, Azure DevOps, or GitLab. It is the traceability chain that banking and other regulated-industry reviewers ask for, kept current by your test runs.
FAQ
Answers teams look for
What is a risk-based testing tool?
A risk-based testing tool lets a QA team record product risks, score them, and tie them to the tests that mitigate them, so test effort follows risk instead of habit. In TestCollab it is a Risks module in the same workspace as your test cases, test plans, and requirements, so links and coverage stay current as tests run.
How does TestCollab score a risk?
Each risk gets a likelihood and an impact from your project's scales. Exposure is the likelihood score multiplied by the impact score, and configurable thresholds map that number to a band such as Low, Medium, High, or Critical. This is the likelihood x impact model described in the ISTQB Foundation syllabus and ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119.
Can I use my own risk scales, categories, and statuses?
Yes. Project administrators configure risk statuses, risk types, the likelihood and impact scales, and the exposure-band thresholds per project. Defaults are included, so a team can start recording risks immediately and refine the setup later.
How is risk coverage calculated?
The Risk summary reports the share of risks that are backed by tests, overall and per exposure band, and each risk shows whether its linked tests passed, failed, or were never run. To raise coverage, link test cases to the risks that do not have any, or create a test plan for the uncovered risks straight from the register.
How is this different from setting a priority on a test case?
A priority is a label on one test case. A risk is its own record with a score, an owner, a status, a mitigation plan, and linked evidence. The Risk Level on a test case is derived from the risks linked to it, so when a risk is rescored every linked test case updates with it.
Does risk-based testing work with Jira or Azure DevOps?
Yes. Risks link to requirements and defects in TestCollab. Requirements can come from Jira, GitLab, or Azure DevOps through the requirements traceability matrix, and defects sync with your issue tracker, so the chain from risk to work item stays intact.
Which plan includes Risk-Based Testing?
Risk-Based Testing is part of the Enterprise plan. See the pricing page for what each plan includes, or book a demo to see it on your own project.
Who can create or edit risks?
Anyone on the project can view the register. Adding, editing, deleting, and linking risks are controlled by five permissions in the Risks group of each role, including variants limited to risks the user created. Only administrators can change the risk settings.
Is there a risk-based testing example I can follow?
The screenshots on this page come from a payments backend demo project, with risks such as an over-limit payment being accepted or a duplicate payment on retry. Our risk-based testing guide walks through the method step by step, and the default scales, types, and statuses act as a ready-made template for your first project.
