Accessibility testing agent for more inclusive web experiences
Detect potential accessibility barriers across pages and user journeys with automated checks, interaction testing, and evidence developers can act on.
Combine repeatable automated checks with the human review accessibility requires.
Trusted by QA teams at
Capabilities
Accessibility testing across rules and real user flows
Find potential barriers covered by automated rules, then identify interactions that need closer human or assistive-technology review.
WCAG 2.2 aligned automated checks
Scan for potential issues covered by automatable rules, including missing accessible names, contrast problems, invalid structure, form labeling, and common ARIA misuse.
Keyboard, focus, and form journey testing
Exercise configured user flows to find unreachable controls, unexpected focus order, focus traps, missing focus indicators, and form interactions that require closer review.
Rendered-state coverage
Inspect configured states in public sites, authenticated applications, and single-page interfaces instead of limiting checks to initial static markup.
How it works
How the accessibility testing agent works
Choose the relevant rules and journeys, run repeatable checks, and keep human verification in the decision loop.
1. Choose pages and accessibility rules
Select public or authenticated journeys, configure the relevant WCAG 2.2 rule level, and document exclusions or components requiring manual review.
2. Scan and exercise user flows
Trigger checks from a deployment webhook, CI/CD, an API call, a manual request, or a schedule to inspect page structure and configured interactions.
3. Remediate and retest
Triage potential barriers with evidence, assign fixes, complete required human checks, and rerun affected journeys to verify improvements.
Evidence
Accessibility findings with actionable context
Give developers the element, rule, state, and reproduction context while making manual-review requirements explicit.
Element and rule location
Return the affected page, rendered state, element, selector, relevant rule, and severity so a developer can locate each potential barrier quickly.
Visual and interaction evidence
Attach applicable screenshots, focus sequences, interaction notes, and reproduction steps for findings discovered during configured journeys.
Remediation and human-review flags
Provide practical remediation guidance and clearly flag criteria that still require keyboard, assistive-technology, usability, or qualified human evaluation.
Platform
One controlled platform for every specialist agent
Deploy, trigger, govern, and connect the accessibility testing agent with the same controls available across the TestCollab agent directory.
Self-hosted with an open-source model
Use the managed service or deploy inside your VPC or on-premises with an approved open-source model, keeping sensitive inputs and results within your chosen environment.
Webhook or scheduler triggers
Launch checks from deployment and pull request webhooks, CI/CD, API calls, manual requests, or a recurring schedule.
Safe access to private environments
Reach staging sites, internal applications, and protected APIs with scoped credentials, network allowlists, and read-only defaults where applicable.
Custom rules and thresholds
Start with built-in checks, then add team-specific rules, severity levels, exclusions, thresholds, and release policies.
Change-aware execution
Use code diffs, changed services, requirements, and risk labels to prioritize the checks most relevant to a release.
Evidence with every finding
Capture pass, fail, and skip results with applicable screenshots, video, logs, traces, differences, and source locations.
Human-controlled release gates
Choose whether a finding informs the team, opens a defect, waits for approval, or blocks a release.
Connected delivery workflow
Send results and evidence to TestCollab, Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Slack, and CI/CD workflows without creating a separate review queue.
Audit-ready history and portable results
Retain configurations, model versions, runs, overrides, and approvals, with portable JSON, JUnit, SARIF, or PDF output where applicable.
FAQ
Answers teams look for
What accessibility issues can the agent find?
It can identify potential issues covered by automated rules and configured interactions, such as contrast failures, missing labels, semantic errors, keyboard barriers, focus problems, and some ARIA misuse.
Does the accessibility testing agent guarantee WCAG compliance?
No. Automated tools cannot evaluate every WCAG success criterion or determine full conformance. Results should be combined with keyboard testing, assistive-technology testing, usability evaluation, and qualified human review.
Can it test authenticated applications and single-page apps?
Yes, when the required routes, test accounts, authentication steps, and permissions are safely configured. The agent can evaluate rendered states and configured journeys rather than only public static pages.
Does a clean automated scan certify that a site is accessible?
No. A clean scan only means the configured automated checks did not detect a covered issue in the states tested. It is not certification and does not replace testing with people, assistive technologies, or accessibility specialists.
Make accessibility checks part of every release
See how an accessibility testing agent can surface potential barriers while preserving the human review needed for responsible decisions.
